End Citizens United: Fighting For The Individual Voices Of The United States’ Citizens

There is an article featured on Reporterexpert.com entitled “End Citizens United: Fighting Against “Anything Goes” Campaign Finance”. This is an important read for anyone who’s interested in the political process. The reason is that of the startling implications that a 2010 Cream Court decision had on said process. The article follows the work being done by a public action committee that has dubbed itself End Citizens United.

ECU is led by Tiffany Muller is relatively new but already making significant waves in the political financing sector. They have contributed a significant amount of money to past elections, with more than $25 million going towards the 2016 election campaign. This was the first cycle that they began raising money for candidates, so this is a significant victory for the group.

Read more on Crunchbase.com

This group is in operation because of a decision made in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission to allow corporations to maintain the same free-speech liberties and that all citizens have today. While it might seem like a good notion at first, the repercussions of such a decision have been long-feared by groups all over the country. These corporations now have access to the freedom of speech laws that help other individuals throughout the political process donate money and voice support for their political candidates. While they could always voice support for these candidates, they are now in a realm where they can do it anonymously and donate an excessive amount of money to their campaigns. In fact, there is now to how much money they are allowed to provide to support those candidates.

End Citizens United seeks to change this decision, but it also understands that changing such a decision is a long-thought process, so they are seeking to help mitigate some of the damage being done by this decision. One way that that is being done is by raising money for candidates. As mentioned previously they have been very successful in that arena and their current cycle is poised to produce more than $35 million for the upcoming candidates. They are hoping that they will continue to outraise big business funded candidates as the races continue. Without a lease on these gigantic corporations, they may have the ability to influence the political outcome of races in an unfair way. This gives them an advantage and takes away the voices of the everyday citizens in the United States, End Citizens United will not stand for that.

Saving the Johnson Amendment

End Citizens United is calling all of their members to counter any actions by the United States government to remove the Johnson Amendment from the constitution. The appeal was made after President Donald Trump signed an executive order that would immediately weaken the scope of the amendment, and the Republican Party is suggesting the total removal of the amendment from the constitution. End Citizens United is an American political organization which was established in 2015 by concerned individuals who believe that the US national elections is no longer transparent and reputable, and that only a few people control the outcome of the election. They believe that private corporations has been given immense power by the United States Supreme Court in 2010 when the latter declared that the private companies and corporations can be treated as a private individual who can support their preferred candidates and can anonymously transfer an infinite amount of funds. End Citizens United is asking the United States Supreme Court to overturn their ruling, because it is slowly destroying the American reputation.

End Citizens United is conducting protests across the country because of the recent decision by the Trump Administration to remove the Johnson Amendment. According to them, this amendment is vital to the constitution because it prohibits private, non tax paying institutions from deliberately supporting or opposing a candidate. End Citizens United stated that once the Trump Administration suceeds in removing the Johnson Amendment, it will give the politicians a chance to use these organizations for their own gains. For example, a wealthy and powerful politician can donate his campaign money to the church for them to hide it from the eyes of the authorities. The politician can use the money any time he or she wanted, and there will be no tax because of the status of the church. This will corrupt the institution, and End Citizens United does not want it to happen. The White House already released a statement that the fate of the Johnson Amendment lies on the decision of the legislature, and they do not have any control regarding the outcome. End Citizens United encouraged their members to watch out for the action of the government, and they are appealing for their members to protect the amendment at all cost.

End Citizens United is serious about their desire to bring the power back to the hands of the people. Earlier this year, the group conducted a fund raising program which aims to support candidates for the 2018 United States National Elections who shares the same cause with the group. With millions of members across the United States supporting End Citizens United, they managed to raise $4 million easily, and experts added that the group can raise up to $32 million because of their immense numbers. Visit:https://mothershipstrategies.com/case-study/end-citizens-united/

 

 

Amendment

Lyndon Johnson is remembered mostly for serving as a predecessor to the late John Kennedy, who was assassinated while in office. Many Americans know that when Lyndon Johnson was a senator, he pushed for a bill regarding church money in politics. The bill, which was titled the Johnson Amendment, came to pass in 1954 with no objections. Today, the bill is likely to be discarded because it seems like non-profit organizations and churches will be allowed to fund political activities.

The good news is that End Citizens United, a political action committee, has expressed its interests to protect the amendment from being discarded. The PAC has been in operation with a goal of overturning the 2010 Citizens United decision. The PAC recently released a press statement suggesting that those opposing the amendment should repeal their efforts. End Citizens United primarily focuses on supporting candidates with interests of overturning Citizens United.

Several non-profit organizations have publicly claimed that Lyndon Johnson was a communist. This is because he expressed his support for End Citizens United, which is on a mission to protect the Johnson Amendment. As a PAC, End Citizens United is on the right track. The law states that non-profit organizations should refrain from participating in political campaigns for them to be entitled to tax exemptions. It also states that the non-profit groups that participate in political campaigns will eventually lose their tax exemptions.

Despite the efforts of non-profit groups and churches to go against the Johnson Amendment, other churches stand with End Citizens United. The PAC’s president (Tiffany Muller) was quoted saying that Republican Party lawmakers are pushing for a tax plan that repeals the amendment. Muller also pointed out that the tax plan may turn churches and charity groups into political fundraisers. It up to End Citizens United to ensure that this plan fails by creating awareness on campaign finance laws.

About End Citizens United

The 2010 US Supreme Court verdict on a case regarding big money in politics led to the establishment of End Citizens United. The petitioners of the case were the Federal Election Commission and Citizens United. Since the US Supreme Court’s verdict was in favor of Citizens United, End Citizens United has been exploring ways to repeal Citizens United. The PAC has raised more than $10 million to support Democratic Party candidates. The PAC has a target for raising $35 million, which will be used during the 2018 election cycle.

With a goal of combating big money in politics, End Citizens United publicly endorsed Democratic Party candidates like Hillary Clinton and Jon Ossoff. Others include Russ Feingold, Elizabeth Warren, and ZephryTeachout. The PAC also made an announcement this year that it had amassed over $7.5 million in grassroots contributions. Read more:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/End_Citizens_United

End Citizens United Plans to be the PAC with Big Money

End Citizens United is a political action committee (PAC) that is raising big money even though their focus is to eradicate big money in politics. According to USA TODAY, the group has managed to collect over $4 million in just three months this year. They also plan to collect $35 million for the 2018 mid-term elections for Congress. This contribution would be fundamental for the group. This is because the group would increase by $10 million from the $25 million of the 2016 election.

 

Tiffany Muller, the group’s president, and executive director cited that around 100,000 people had contributed money to the group. Moreover, 40,000 of them were contributing for the first time. Muller mentioned that the group’s goal encompasses electing champions of campaign-finance reform to Congress. She also said that they had received an average contribution of $12 this year. Further, the PAC’s donors felt deceived because the highest contributors had the biggest say. Muller added that Democrats were not pleased with the victory of Donald Trump and claimed to fight back against Trump’s agendas as well as his nominees such as Judge Neil Gorsuch.

 

End Citizens United has urged donors to contribute $500,000 to the congressional campaign of Jon Ossof who is a Democrat and Georgia’s first-time political candidate. Jon took everyone by surprise when he collected over $4 million for the April 18 election, which aims to fill a vacant Republican House Seat in Atlanta. Furthermore, he plans to replace Tom Price, the former Secretary of Health and Human Service. Muller mentioned that the PAC is still examining the race that will be active next year. She added that the group would support Jon Tester of Montana and Democratic Sens. Sherrod Brown who comes from Ohio.

 

The Supreme Court’s decision in Citizens United in 2010 assisted the group to acquire corporate donors in candidate election as well as launching super PACs. The group is a conservative political action committee that does not accept donations that exceed $5,000 for an individual donor. Regardless of the donation limit, 2016’s fundraising assisted the election expenditure for the Democratic groups. Last year’s fundraising has facilitated concern among campaign-finance regulators. These individuals prioritize grassroots activism over assembling political money.

 

Other involvements of End Citizens United

 

Adam Bozzi, the spokesperson of End Citizens United, cited that the group had close ties with campaign-finance groups. For example, the group had collaborated with over 24 groups to urge Republican senators who benefited from the contribution of Betsy DeVos, alongside her wealthy family, to disqualify themselves from voting on her nomination as the Education Secretary of Donald Trump. The Senate carried out an election, which favored DeVos. The VP Pence also voted in her favor when they got a tie of 50-50.

 

George Soros on the Front Lines of Liberalism

His name is George Soros and he is a leading liberal figure in the world. Soros is one of the world’s top 30th richest persons. He is so wealthy that he has the ability to influence politics, laws and policies that impact millions of lives all over the globe.

Soros has been on the front lines of liberalism for many years. His political disposition and worldview leans to the left. Soros is also a leading financial figure for liberalism. Over the years, he has made many donations through his Open Society Foundations institution.

Open Society Foundation has been responsible for providing funding for hundreds of organizations located within 100 different countries. These organizations would then carry out an agenda that helped to keep societies open and free. Much of Soros’s philanthropic work is also designed to help promote liberal causes and rights within society.

Know more: https://www.opensocietyfoundations.org/people/george-soros

While Soros is not the only billionaire funder for liberal causes he certainly is a major player. His donations and contributions are essential to the liberal agenda. He is a major general on the frontlines of liberalism. There are other liberal billionaires and millionaires who are also influential like him.

Each of these individuals makes their own contributions to the cause of liberalism. Soros’s work as a major influencer of politics cannot be denied. George Soros is a very imposing figure on the political scene. His efforts help to keep a lot of conservative ideology in check.

George Soros has many enemies from the conservative ranks. A lot of conservative organizations and governmental agencies stand against Soros because his ideas often collide with their own. Soros is not a big fan of big government. Especially, if that government supports policies that attacks specific groups of people.

President Donald Trump’s policies are often rejected by Soros. As a political policy influencer, Soros knows that Trump’s particular policies clash with his own. President Trump’s first 100 days in office were being opposed by Soros because his policies were deemed as unfair and dangerous for the American people.

During his first 100 days in office, President Trump restricted the inflow of refugees and immigrants from specific countries. This was viewed by Soros and other supporters of the left as a means to close America’s societies. When a government restricts the rights of people or keeps a certain group of people from exercising their full rights; that government is engaging in closed societal activities. Visit projectsyndicate.com to know more about George.

Ultimately, Soros wants to ensure that every person has the right to enjoy the modern freedoms that all people should have. He pushes liberalism so that people will be able to live life in their own way without having to worry about discrimination, hatred and being marginalized by those in power. Read more about George’s life story at biography.com.